Re: [PATCH 11/11] ASoC: topology: Unify kcontrol removal code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 1/27/23 05:12, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
> On 1/25/2023 4:15 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1/25/23 13:46, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
>>> Functions removing bytes, enum and mixer kcontrols are identical. Unify
>>
>> they are identical because of the change in patch10.
>>
>> Please clarify that this is not a cleanup removing duplicated code
>> that's been there forever, it's become useless as a result of the
>> previous patch.
>>
> 
> There is no dependency on previous patch - it is just order I've send
> them in - those functions have same implementation in current code.

Not following, sorry. What is this addition in patch 10?

diff --git a/include/sound/soc-topology.h b/include/sound/soc-topology.h
index b4b896f83b94..f055c6917f6c 100644
--- a/include/sound/soc-topology.h
+++ b/include/sound/soc-topology.h
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct snd_soc_dobj {
 	enum snd_soc_dobj_type type;
 	unsigned int index;	/* objects can belong in different groups */
 	struct list_head list;
-	struct snd_soc_tplg_ops *ops;
+	int (*unload)(struct snd_soc_component *comp, struct snd_soc_dobj *dobj);

That's not in 'current code', is it? How is this not a dependency?



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux