On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 12:15:10PM +0100, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote: > El vie, 25 nov 2022 a las 17:37, Charles Keepax > (<ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>) escribió: > > > > The table in the datasheet actually shows the volume values in the wrong > > order, with the two -3dB values being reversed. This appears to have > > caused the lower of the two values to be used in the driver when the > > higher should have been, correct this mixup. > > > > Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > No changes since v1. > > > > sound/soc/codecs/cs42l51.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/cs42l51.c b/sound/soc/codecs/cs42l51.c > > index 51721edd8f53c..e88d9ff95cdfc 100644 > > --- a/sound/soc/codecs/cs42l51.c > > +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/cs42l51.c > > @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static const struct snd_kcontrol_new cs42l51_snd_controls[] = { > > 0, 0xA0, 96, adc_att_tlv), > > SOC_DOUBLE_R_SX_TLV("PGA Volume", > > CS42L51_ALC_PGA_CTL, CS42L51_ALC_PGB_CTL, > > - 0, 0x19, 30, pga_tlv), > > + 0, 0x1A, 30, pga_tlv), > > The original patch where this control was added [1] already used 0x1A, > however this was later changed to 0x19 in [2]. Your patch now reverts > that change. Does this mean [2] was incorrect? If that is the case, > shouldn't the commit message for this patch mention that it fixes [2] > ? > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200918134317.22574-1-guille.rodriguez@xxxxxxxxx/ > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220602162119.3393857-7-ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > Hmm... good digging, I didn't realise it was me who broke that. Apologies in that chain I went around and checked a bunch of SX controls to make sure they matched the datasheets, but it seems I got a bit confused by the weird ordering of the values in the datasheet. Since you have hardware would you be able to check, before we merge this revert? A simple check that writing 0 to the control sets the register value to 0x1A and writing 30 sets the register to 0x18 would suffice. Thanks, Charles