On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:36:19AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > OOI, I guess that if there were some visible control on the board (eg, a > > few controls via GPIO) then this would be less of an issue since there > > would be real hardware for the machine/fabric driver to control? > Probably not, because the GPIO node in the device tree would be owned by the > GPIO driver. I don't think there's a way to have the fabric driver probed from > the device tree. It could be probed manually from the arch/powerpc platform driver. But wouldn't it now be legal to represent the machine driver as a device in its own right, even if it is connected via GPIOs? _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
