Mark Brown wrote: > OOI, I guess that if there were some visible control on the board (eg, a > few controls via GPIO) then this would be less of an issue since there > would be real hardware for the machine/fabric driver to control? Probably not, because the GPIO node in the device tree would be owned by the GPIO driver. I don't think there's a way to have the fabric driver probed from the device tree. It could be probed manually from the arch/powerpc platform driver. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
