>>> @@ -1582,6 +1597,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id
>>> qcom_swrm_of_match[] = {
>>> { .compatible = "qcom,soundwire-v1.3.0", .data =
>>> &swrm_v1_3_data },
>>> { .compatible = "qcom,soundwire-v1.5.1", .data =
>>> &swrm_v1_5_data },
>>> { .compatible = "qcom,soundwire-v1.6.0", .data =
>>> &swrm_v1_6_data },
>>> + { .compatible = "qcom,soundwire-v1.7.0", .data = &swrm_v1_5_data },
>>
>> is this line intentional, it looks odd that 1.7 is compatible with 1.5,
>> but 1.6 isn't?
> This is more around the data rather than compatible, 1.6 data is marked
> with sw_clk_gate_required = true which is not the case with 1.7.
>
> from 1.5 we use same frame shape info for 1.6, 1.7, except that 1.6 had
> this sw_clk_gate_required flag set.
probably worthy of a comment to show intent and explain the differences?
