Il 08/07/22 12:19, Jiaxin Yu ha scritto:
On Fri, 2022-07-08 at 10:01 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
Il 08/07/22 04:46, Zhongjun Tan ha scritto:
From: Zhongjun Tan <tanzhongjun@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Remove condition with no effect
Signed-off-by: Zhongjun Tan <tanzhongjun@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c
b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c
index db71b032770d..6be6d4f3b585 100644
--- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c
+++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c
@@ -295,8 +295,6 @@ static int mtk_adda_pad_top_event(struct
snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
case SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMU:
if (afe_priv->mtkaif_protocol ==
MTKAIF_PROTOCOL_2_CLK_P2)
regmap_write(afe->regmap, AFE_AUD_PAD_TOP,
0x39);
- else if (afe_priv->mtkaif_protocol ==
MTKAIF_PROTOCOL_2)
- regmap_write(afe->regmap, AFE_AUD_PAD_TOP,
0x31);
I think that this needs some clarification from MediaTek: was 0x31 a
typo here?
Regards,
Angelo
Hi Angelo,
This patch can be accepted. The 0x31 is not typo, the logic of this
code is not concise enough.
Thanks,
Jiaxin.Yu
Thank you for the clarification. In this case:
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cheers!
else
regmap_write(afe->regmap, AFE_AUD_PAD_TOP,
0x31);
break;
