On Fri, 2022-07-08 at 10:01 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > Il 08/07/22 04:46, Zhongjun Tan ha scritto: > > From: Zhongjun Tan <tanzhongjun@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Remove condition with no effect > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhongjun Tan <tanzhongjun@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c | 2 -- > > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c > > b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c > > index db71b032770d..6be6d4f3b585 100644 > > --- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c > > +++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c > > @@ -295,8 +295,6 @@ static int mtk_adda_pad_top_event(struct > > snd_soc_dapm_widget *w, > > case SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMU: > > if (afe_priv->mtkaif_protocol == > > MTKAIF_PROTOCOL_2_CLK_P2) > > regmap_write(afe->regmap, AFE_AUD_PAD_TOP, > > 0x39); > > - else if (afe_priv->mtkaif_protocol == > > MTKAIF_PROTOCOL_2) > > - regmap_write(afe->regmap, AFE_AUD_PAD_TOP, > > 0x31); > > I think that this needs some clarification from MediaTek: was 0x31 a > typo here? > > Regards, > Angelo > Hi Angelo, This patch can be accepted. The 0x31 is not typo, the logic of this code is not concise enough. Thanks, Jiaxin.Yu > > else > > regmap_write(afe->regmap, AFE_AUD_PAD_TOP, > > 0x31); > > break; > >
