Hi 2008/5/15 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>: > At Thu, 15 May 2008 03:26:00 +0200, > Xavi de Blas wrote: >> >> Hello, we have been talking on this thread: >> >> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2007-July/001939.html >> >> because i had a problem with my hda that Takashi said it's really >> specific to my hardware: >> >> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2007-July/001963.html >> >> Now with kernel 2.6.24-16 and alsa 1.0.16, i have no audio again: >> >> i tried now using the patch Tobin made: >> >> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2007-July/001934.html >> >> and it' doesn't work. In fact, i haven't used the patch, i only added the line: >> >> { .id = 0x51d41981, .name = "AD1981", .patch = patch_ad1981 }, >> after the line: >> { .id = 0x11d41981, .name = "AD1981", .patch = patch_ad1981 }, >> >> on: /usr/local/src/alsa-driver-1.0.16/alsa-kernel/pci/hda/patch_analog.c >> >> ./configure, make, sudo make install >> >> on reboot, the error is the same as before: >> >> dmesg|grep alsa >> [ 41.284537] ALSA >> /build/buildd/linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-2.6.24/debian/build/build-generic/sound/alsa-driver/pci/hda/hda_codec.c:230: >> hda_codec: invalid dep_range_val 53:1a > > This means that the codec information is fairly broken. > The driver should work still. It just ignores the broken entries. > > As this doesn't happen (the first time I got this kind of problem from > the good working codec support), I suspect the hardware problem.. > But this it's exactly the same error message i had in previous kernel, and it gets solved with the patch. Do you think there's a solution for me? Why don't work now? Do you need more logs of my system? Thanks a lot > > Takashi > >> >> here is my /proc/asound/card0/codec#0 >> >> http://pastebin.ca/1018596 >> >> Thanks a lot >> >> >> 2007/7/9 Xavi de Blas <xaviblas@xxxxxxxxx>: >> > It worked!!! >> > >> > Thanks a lot >> > >> > I thought my hardware was broken! >> > >> > 2007/7/9, Tobin Davis <tdavis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> >> >> >> Patch needs to be applied as follows: >> >> >> >> cd alsa-driver-1.0.14/alsa-kernel >> >> patch -p1 < LenovoX60S.patch >> >> cd .. >> >> >> >> Then you can rerun configure && make && make install. >> >> >> >> Tobin >> >> >> >> On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 17:25 +0200, Xavi de Blas wrote: >> >> >> >> 2007/7/9, Tobin Davis <tdavis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> >> > Sorry for missing this thread. I just woke up. >> >> > >> >> > I looked at your first pastebin output, and the actual audio codec shows >> >> > up as 0x51d41981, when it should be 0x11d41981. This is why the Analog >> >> > driver patch isn't detecting it. >> >> > >> >> > Can you try this patch against alsa-driver-1.0.14? It should detect >> >> > this codec. Still not sure why it is misconfigured, unless there is a >> >> > bios issue. >> >> > >> >> >> >> I'm afraid, probably when i tried the Linuxant codecs for the modem it >> >> broke the >> >> bios. Not sure, but sound worked, and continued working some reboots >> >> later. But when i tried a few things with wine and rebooted, sound >> >> never worked again >> >> >> >> When i aply the patch (probably i don't do it good) there are problems: >> >> >> >> >> >> xavier@corall:/usr/local/src/alsa-src/alsa-driver-1.0.14$ cat >> >> LenovoX60S.patch | patch -p1 >> >> patching file pci/hda/patch_analog.c >> >> Hunk #1 FAILED at 3402. >> >> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file >> >> pci/hda/patch_analog.c.rej >> >> >> >> >> >> xavier@corall:/usr/local/src/alsa-src/alsa-driver-1.0.14/pci/hda$ cat >> >> patch_analog.c.rej >> >> *************** struct hda_codec_preset snd_hda_preset_a >> >> *** 3402,3407 **** >> >> { .id = 0x11d41882, .name = "AD1882", .patch = patch_ad1882 }, >> >> { .id = 0x11d41884, .name = "AD1884", .patch = patch_ad1884 }, >> >> { .id = 0x11d41981, .name = "AD1981", .patch = patch_ad1981 }, >> >> { .id = 0x11d41983, .name = "AD1983", .patch = patch_ad1983 }, >> >> { .id = 0x11d41984, .name = "AD1984", .patch = patch_ad1984 }, >> >> { .id = 0x11d41986, .name = "AD1986A", .patch = patch_ad1986a }, >> >> --- 3402,3408 ---- >> >> { .id = 0x11d41882, .name = "AD1882", .patch = patch_ad1882 }, >> >> { .id = 0x11d41884, .name = "AD1884", .patch = patch_ad1884 }, >> >> { .id = 0x11d41981, .name = "AD1981", .patch = patch_ad1981 }, >> >> + { .id = 0x51d41981, .name = "AD1981", .patch = patch_ad1981 }, >> >> { .id = 0x11d41983, .name = "AD1983", .patch = patch_ad1983 }, >> >> { .id = 0x11d41984, .name = "AD1984", .patch = patch_ad1984 }, >> >> { .id = 0x11d41986, .name = "AD1986A", .patch = patch_ad1986a }, >> >> >> >> >> >> The patch is ok? >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> (Tobin sorry for sending messge two times) >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Tobin Davis <tdavis@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
