On 2022-05-27 8:50 AM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
I'm sorry but I'm not well understanding what does "machine device"
is meaning here.
But anyway, if my understanding is correct, AVS solution was like this ?
+-- DeviceA --+ +-- DeviceB -+
|+-----------+| |+----------+|
||ComponentA1|| ||ComponentB||
|| [DAI] <-> [DAI] || Card-1
|+-----------+| |+----------+|
| | +------------+
| |
| | +-- DeviceC -+
|+-----------+| |+----------+|
||ComponentA2|| ||ComponentC||
|| [DAI] <-> [DAI] || Card-2
|+-----------+| |+----------+|
+-------------+ +------------+
If [DeviceA] could separate feature into [ComponentA1] and [ComponentA2],
it can use multi Cards on current ASoC, but it is not a generic solution,
as Pierre-Louis explained. I can agree about it if my understanding was
correct. At least my Sound can't use this style.
Hello Kuninori,
Could you explain what you meant by "my Sound"? Perhaps you could also
share location of problematic bits in your driver (file path + code
lines)? I'd like to take a look - if possible, that is - to better
understand your issue.
Regards,
Czarek
