On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:53:07AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 12:46:42PM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:12:02AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > These look like they should be DAPM controls since they're controlling
> > > audio routing but they're being added as regular controls.
>
> > Sorry again. You suggest to create a new structure for these entries,
> > for example:
>
> > /* Out Bypass mixer switch */
> > static const struct snd_kcontrol_new max98088_out_bypass_mixer_controls[] = {
> > SOC_DAPM_SINGLE("INA Switch", M98088_REG_4A_CFG_BYPASS, 7, 1, 0),
> > SOC_DAPM_SINGLE("MIC2 Switch", M98088_REG_4A_CFG_BYPASS, 4, 1, 0),
> > SOC_DAPM_SINGLE("REC Switch", M98088_REG_4A_CFG_BYPASS, 1, 1, 0),
> > SOC_DAPM_SINGLE("SPK Switch", M98088_REG_4A_CFG_BYPASS, 0, 1, 0),
> > };
>
> If that's how they fit into the routing for the device, yes - you'd need
> to define the bypass mixer as well and set up appropraite routes.
Hi,
I added this reg as regular controls because this reg is pretty generic
as you can see this controll bypass of some output, not all.
What do you think about?
Thanks,
Tommaso
--
Tommaso Merciai
Embedded Linux Engineer
tommaso.merciai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
__________________________________
Amarula Solutions SRL
Via Le Canevare 30, 31100 Treviso, Veneto, IT
T. +39 042 243 5310
info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.amarulasolutions.com
