On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 12:46:42PM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:12:02AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > These look like they should be DAPM controls since they're controlling
> > audio routing but they're being added as regular controls.
> Sorry again. You suggest to create a new structure for these entries,
> for example:
> /* Out Bypass mixer switch */
> static const struct snd_kcontrol_new max98088_out_bypass_mixer_controls[] = {
> SOC_DAPM_SINGLE("INA Switch", M98088_REG_4A_CFG_BYPASS, 7, 1, 0),
> SOC_DAPM_SINGLE("MIC2 Switch", M98088_REG_4A_CFG_BYPASS, 4, 1, 0),
> SOC_DAPM_SINGLE("REC Switch", M98088_REG_4A_CFG_BYPASS, 1, 1, 0),
> SOC_DAPM_SINGLE("SPK Switch", M98088_REG_4A_CFG_BYPASS, 0, 1, 0),
> };
If that's how they fit into the routing for the device, yes - you'd need
to define the bypass mixer as well and set up appropraite routes.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
