On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 17:31:51 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 04:21:38PM +0800, Xiaomeng Tong wrote:
>
> > case snd_soc_dapm_pre:
> > - if (!w->event)
> > + if (!w->event) {
> > list_for_each_entry_safe_continue(w, n, list,
> > power_list);
> > + break;
> > + }
>
> This doesn't make much sense. The intent here seems to clearly be to
> continue; the loop but this doesn't do that - instead it appears that
> continue doesn't actually do the equivalent of a continue but rather
> skips over an entry. This should instead be replaced with a plain
> continue statement.
>
Yes, you are right. Sorry for a slip of the pen in commit message:
should be "to *continue* the outer list_for_each_entry_safe() loop"
not "to break ...".
I have resend a PATCH v2 for the fix as you suggested, and cc you.
Thank you.
> THe naming of _continue() needs fixing I think - it's just asking to be
> a bug. Fortunately there's very few users.
--
Xiaomeng Tong
