On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 04:21:38PM +0800, Xiaomeng Tong wrote:
> case snd_soc_dapm_pre:
> - if (!w->event)
> + if (!w->event) {
> list_for_each_entry_safe_continue(w, n, list,
> power_list);
> + break;
> + }
This doesn't make much sense. The intent here seems to clearly be to
continue; the loop but this doesn't do that - instead it appears that
continue doesn't actually do the equivalent of a continue but rather
skips over an entry. This should instead be replaced with a plain
continue statement.
THe naming of _continue() needs fixing I think - it's just asking to be
a bug. Fortunately there's very few users.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
