> > > > In the past we used this configuration for SOF CI tests with the > > MinnowBoard > > + an RT5682 eval board. We gradually fried most boards and no longer > > + check > > this capability for each SOF PR. > > > > So I would agree we can avoid changing anything for BYT/CHT and > > possibly APL, it'd be an untested configuration. > > > > in other words, let's add this compatible/alt_id for platforms where > > we know it'll be used. > > Agree with Pierre. "RTL5682" is a new codec which is different from > "10EC5682" and not tested on old platforms. As I know the part is introduced to JSL and ADL projects so maybe we can keep the change to JSL/TGL/ADL boards?
