>> @@ -196,6 +201,7 @@ struct snd_soc_acpi_mach snd_soc_acpi_intel_baytrail_machines[] = {
>> },
>> {
>> .id = "10EC5682",
>> + .id_alt = &rt5682s_hp,
>> .drv_name = "sof_rt5682",
>> .sof_fw_filename = "sof-byt.ri",
>> .sof_tplg_filename = "sof-byt-rt5682.tplg",
>
> So this is only useful if there actually are any BYT devices using the "RTL5682"
> ACPI HID, the 100+ BYT/CHT DSDTs which I've gather over time say there aren't any.
>
> Actually there also aren't any using the non alt "10EC5682" ACPI HID either...
>
> Bard Liao, you added this in commit f70abd75b7c6 ("ASoC: Intel: add sof-rt5682 machine driver")
> but I wonder how useful this is. I guess it may be available as (and tested on?) some dev-kit.
>
> But I don't think there us any hardware out there in the wild using this ?
In the past we used this configuration for SOF CI tests with the
MinnowBoard + an RT5682 eval board. We gradually fried most boards and
no longer check this capability for each SOF PR.
So I would agree we can avoid changing anything for BYT/CHT and possibly
APL, it'd be an untested configuration.
in other words, let's add this compatible/alt_id for platforms where we
know it'll be used.
