> > The code is looks fine, but Jack Yu added a separate patch that makes > > RTL1019 equivalent to RTL1015, so should this patch also handle the > > RTL1019 case? > > The topology used by this machine driver is using 48k, 64fs I2S format. > RT1019 needs to support this configuration. Not sure if RT1019 could support > that. > Yes, RT1019 supports 48k, 64fs I2S format.