On Fri, 05 Feb 2021, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 08:34:16AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Thu, 04 Feb 2021, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 03:40:58PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > On Thu, 04 Feb 2021, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 03:04:56PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > > > This set has all the Acks we need to proceed. What's blocking? > > > > > > There's the subsystem maintainer... > > > > > I assume that was a question and you meant "where's"? > > > > > Pierre is listed as the Maintainer. > > > > I'm fairly sure you can see what I meant here and why there might be a > > > concern. > > > So that should be a Reviewed-by and not an Acked-by then. That's fine. > > No, it's that there's plenty of drivers like this that are listed in > MAINTAINERS but still generally go through subsystem trees - this is > also true of for quite a few MFD drivers, you tend to get a bit annoyed > (quite reasonably) whenever I mistakenly pull MFD changes for them into > one of my trees without syncing with you. Driver Maintainers in MFD don't sent Acks. > > What do you want to happen with this set then? > > > You want it broken up? > > I guess, or at least a pull request so it's in my tree and I'll notice > any coverage issues. Okay, I'll process it. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
