On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 08:34:16AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 04 Feb 2021, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 03:40:58PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, 04 Feb 2021, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 03:04:56PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > This set has all the Acks we need to proceed. What's blocking? > > > > There's the subsystem maintainer... > > > I assume that was a question and you meant "where's"? > > > Pierre is listed as the Maintainer. > > I'm fairly sure you can see what I meant here and why there might be a > > concern. > So that should be a Reviewed-by and not an Acked-by then. That's fine. No, it's that there's plenty of drivers like this that are listed in MAINTAINERS but still generally go through subsystem trees - this is also true of for quite a few MFD drivers, you tend to get a bit annoyed (quite reasonably) whenever I mistakenly pull MFD changes for them into one of my trees without syncing with you. > What do you want to happen with this set then? > You want it broken up? I guess, or at least a pull request so it's in my tree and I'll notice any coverage issues.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
