On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:54:21 -0400, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote: > Almost all other allocations in ASoC API are resource managed, the only > exception is soc-topology.c. > > This patchset clean ups few unnecessary functions in preparation for > change and then changes to devm_ functions for allocation. > > Amadeusz Sławiński (6): > ASoC: topology: Remove unused functions from topology API > ASoC: topology: Remove multistep topology loading > ASoC: topology: Unify all device references > ASoC: topology: Change allocations to resource managed > ASoC: topology: Remove empty functions > ASoC: topology: Simplify remove_widget function > > [...] Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next Thanks! [1/6] ASoC: topology: Remove unused functions from topology API commit: 841fb1096713bdd85cb2484557623136e10041d2 [2/6] ASoC: topology: Remove multistep topology loading commit: a5b8f71c5477f4327c66a085d9714fe298510819 [3/6] ASoC: topology: Unify all device references commit: e59db12b8df3ab07dcfe3540ecdf782d4272f263 [4/6] ASoC: topology: Change allocations to resource managed commit: ff922622443767b27232eb01bae1d9a8d42df073 [5/6] ASoC: topology: Remove empty functions commit: 033df362ea3635179d1defed2230be69ed632c05 [6/6] ASoC: topology: Simplify remove_widget function commit: 8d456654839cd4fd10225ffa9c70c64784615f95 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark
