> On Oct 27, 2020, at 16:15, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 09:12:07 +0100,
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 08:46:05 +0100,
>> Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>>> @@ -1103,10 +1115,8 @@ static int azx_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>>> chip = card->private_data;
>>>>
>>>> /* enable controller wake up event */
>>>> - if (snd_power_get_state(card) == SNDRV_CTL_POWER_D0) {
>>>> - azx_writew(chip, WAKEEN, azx_readw(chip, WAKEEN) |
>>>> - STATESTS_INT_MASK);
>>>> - }
>>>> + azx_writew(chip, WAKEEN, azx_readw(chip, WAKEEN) |
>>>> + STATESTS_INT_MASK);
>>>
>>> ... here we should have the check of chip->prepared, and set WAKEEN
>>> only when it's false. Otherwise WAKEEN is set up for the system
>>> suspend, and it might lead to spurious wakeups. (IOW, checking the
>>> flag at resume doesn't help for preventing the spurious wakeup :)
>>
>> Scratch my comment above; it's the code path only for the runtime
>> suspend in your new code, then this cleanup makes sense.
>
> Also, as one more cleanup: from_rt in __azx_runtime_resume() can be
> replaced with !chip->prepared flag, so the extra argument can be
> dropped.
Ok, will send v3 to address it.
Kai-Heng
>
>
> Takashi
