On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 09:12:07 +0100,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 08:46:05 +0100,
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > @@ -1103,10 +1115,8 @@ static int azx_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > > chip = card->private_data;
> > >
> > > /* enable controller wake up event */
> > > - if (snd_power_get_state(card) == SNDRV_CTL_POWER_D0) {
> > > - azx_writew(chip, WAKEEN, azx_readw(chip, WAKEEN) |
> > > - STATESTS_INT_MASK);
> > > - }
> > > + azx_writew(chip, WAKEEN, azx_readw(chip, WAKEEN) |
> > > + STATESTS_INT_MASK);
> >
> > ... here we should have the check of chip->prepared, and set WAKEEN
> > only when it's false. Otherwise WAKEEN is set up for the system
> > suspend, and it might lead to spurious wakeups. (IOW, checking the
> > flag at resume doesn't help for preventing the spurious wakeup :)
>
> Scratch my comment above; it's the code path only for the runtime
> suspend in your new code, then this cleanup makes sense.
Also, as one more cleanup: from_rt in __azx_runtime_resume() can be
replaced with !chip->prepared flag, so the extra argument can be
dropped.
Takashi
