On 9/23/2020 4:34 PM, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
Dne 23. 09. 20 v 10:05 Kai Vehmanen napsal(a):
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Somehow for this codec we never used any prefix for the controls,
likely because the test platform has a single SoundWire device.
Follow the convention and use the codec prefix across the board to
avoid possible conflicts.
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw_rt700.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw_rt700.c b/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw_rt700.c
index bff69cfe27f4..21e7e4a81779 100644
--- a/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw_rt700.c
+++ b/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw_rt700.c
@@ -23,9 +23,9 @@ static const struct snd_soc_dapm_widget rt700_widgets[] = {
static const struct snd_soc_dapm_route rt700_map[] = {
/* Headphones */
- { "Headphones", NULL, "HP" },
- { "Speaker", NULL, "SPK" },
- { "MIC2", NULL, "AMIC" },
+ { "Headphones", NULL, "rt700 HP" },
+ { "Speaker", NULL, "rt700 SPK" },
+ { "rt700 MIC2", NULL, "AMIC" },
This line looks suspicious. Perhaps, the prefix should be added before AMIC ?
The "rt700" is a prefix for rt700 codec and the "MIC2" is one of rt700's
widget and "AMIC" is machine driver's widget. So "rt700 MIC2" looks correct
to me.
Jaroslav