> -----Original Message----- > From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 1:11 PM > To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; alsa-devel@alsa- > project.org; tiwai@xxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ranjani.sridharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > hui.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; broonie@xxxxxxxxxx; > srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx; jank@xxxxxxxxxxx; Lin, Mengdong > <mengdong.lin@xxxxxxxxx>; Kale, Sanyog R <sanyog.r.kale@xxxxxxxxx>; > rander.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Liao, Bard <bard.liao@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ASoC: soundwire: Move sdw stream operations to > > On 03-09-20, 09:05, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > > > > > On 9/3/20 5:42 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > > > On 01-09-20, 23:02, Bard Liao wrote: > > > > sdw stream operation APIs can be called once per stream. dailink > > > > callbacks are good places to call these APIs. > > > > > > Again, please mention here if this is to be merged thru sdw tree or > > > ASoC tree > > > > Good point, I thought it wouldn't matter but it does. I just gave it a > > try and there seems to be a conflict on Mark's tree w/ > > drivers/soundwire/intel.c (likely due to missing patches already added to > Vinod's tree). > > > > So this should go to Vinod's tree with Mark's Acked-by tag on the ASoC > > changes. > > > > Alternatively we can also split this in two, with ASoC-only and > > SoundWire-only patches in separate series if it's easier for > > maintainers. We would lose the rationale for the changes but that's not > essential. > > If there are no dependencies on each other, that is best preferred option. > One should mention in cover-letter about the linked series though. Sent as v2
