On 03-09-20, 09:05, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > > On 9/3/20 5:42 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On 01-09-20, 23:02, Bard Liao wrote: > > > sdw stream operation APIs can be called once per stream. dailink > > > callbacks are good places to call these APIs. > > > > Again, please mention here if this is to be merged thru sdw tree or ASoC > > tree > > Good point, I thought it wouldn't matter but it does. I just gave it a try > and there seems to be a conflict on Mark's tree w/ drivers/soundwire/intel.c > (likely due to missing patches already added to Vinod's tree). > > So this should go to Vinod's tree with Mark's Acked-by tag on the ASoC > changes. > > Alternatively we can also split this in two, with ASoC-only and > SoundWire-only patches in separate series if it's easier for maintainers. We > would lose the rationale for the changes but that's not essential. If there are no dependencies on each other, that is best preferred option. One should mention in cover-letter about the linked series though. > > > > Pierre-Louis Bossart (7): > > > ASoC: soc-dai: clarify return value for get_sdw_stream() > > > soundwire: stream: fix NULL/IS_ERR confusion > > > soundwire: intel: fix NULL/ERR_PTR confusion > > > ASOC: Intel: sof_sdw: add dailink .trigger callback > > > ASOC: Intel: sof_sdw: add dailink .prepare and .hw_free callback > > > > These should be ASoC > > Right. if you are fine with the content and this goes in your tree, can this > be modified while applying? Or do want a v2? > > > > soundwire: intel: remove .trigger operation > > > soundwire: intel: remove stream handling from .prepare and .hw_free > > > > > > drivers/soundwire/intel.c | 60 ++++------------------- > > > drivers/soundwire/stream.c | 2 +- > > > include/sound/soc-dai.h | 3 +- > > > sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 4 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) > > > > > > -- > > > 2.17.1 > > -- ~Vinod
