> When snd_usb_mixer_add_control() fails, elem needs to be
> freed just like when snd_ctl_new1() fails. However, current
> code is returning directly and ends up leaking memory.
Can an imperative wording be preferred for the change description?
…
> +++ b/sound/usb/mixer_scarlett_gen2.c
> @@ -964,8 +964,10 @@ static int scarlett2_add_new_ctl(struct usb_mixer_interface *mixer,
> strlcpy(kctl->id.name, name, sizeof(kctl->id.name));
>
> err = snd_usb_mixer_add_control(&elem->head, kctl);
> - if (err < 0)
> + if (err < 0) {
> + kfree(elem);
> return err;
> + }
…
I propose to add a jump target so that a bit of common exception handling code
can be better reused in this function implementation.
Regards,
Markus
