At Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:02:40 -0500, Matthew Ranostay wrote: > > @@ -1408,22 +1409,24 @@ static unsigned int dell_3st_pin_configs > static unsigned int dell_3st_pin_configs[14] = { > 0x02211230, 0x02a11220, 0x01a19040, 0x01114210, > 0x01111212, 0x01116211, 0x01813050, 0x01112214, > - 0x403003fa, 0x40000100, 0x40000100, 0x404003fb, > + 0x403003fa, 0x90a60040, 0x90a60040, 0x404003fb, > 0x40c003fc, 0x40000100 > }; Just to be sure - is it safe to change this? > @@ -3293,8 +3304,11 @@ static int patch_stac927x(struct hda_cod > stac927x_models, > stac927x_cfg_tbl); > again: > - if (spec->board_config < 0) { > - snd_printdd(KERN_INFO "hda_codec: Unknown model for STAC927x, using BIOS defaults\n"); > + if (spec->board_config < 0 || > + stac927x_brd_tbl[spec->board_config] != NULL) { Should be stac927x_brd_tbl[spec->board_config] == NULL. Also, the following else-if should be fixed (the check is nonsense). I applied the fixed patch to HG tree. Could you check whether it's OK? Thanks, Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel