Hi Sameer
> PCM devices are created for dai links with 'no-pcm' flag as '0'.
> Such DAI links have CPU component which implement pcm_construct()
> and pcm_destruct() callbacks. Based on this, current patch exposes
> a helper function to identify such components and populate 'no_pcm'
> flag for DPCM DAI link.
>
> This helps to have BE<->BE component links where PCM devices need
> not be created for CPU components involved in the links.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
(snip)
> +bool soc_component_is_pcm(struct snd_soc_dai_link_component *dlc)
> +{
> + struct snd_soc_component *component;
> + struct snd_soc_dai *dai;
> +
> + for_each_component(component) {
> + if (!component->driver)
> + continue;
> +
> + for_each_component_dais(component, dai) {
> + if (!dai->name || !dlc->dai_name)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (strcmp(dai->name, dlc->dai_name))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (component->driver->pcm_construct)
> + return true;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
At least my CPU driver doesn't use component:pcm_construct
but is using DAI:pcm_new for some reasons.
I'm not sure checking DAI:pcm here is enough, or not...
Thank you for your help !!
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto
