On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 4:55 PM Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > clk_prepare_enable and clk_disable_unprepare check the input > > clock parameter in the beginning of the function, > > These functions call further functions which perform null pointer checks. > > > > if the parameter > > is NULL, clk_prepare_enable and clk_disable_unprepare will > > return immediately. > > The interpretation of these function implementations seems to be reasonable. > Would you like to achieve any improvements for the corresponding software documentation? Which document do you mean? > > > > So Don't need to check input clock parameters before calling clk API. > > What do you find imperative in this wording? > > Another wording alternative: > Thus omit extra null pointer checks before four function calls. > > Regards, > Markus
