At Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:35:41 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 03:42:17PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > Mark Brown wrote: > > > > consistency I'd rather leave this just now and then separately go > > > through and address this for all drivers at once - does that seem > > > sensible to you? > > > Well, the problem is that the dependency with I2C is incomplete right > > now. We may build ASOC=y and I2C=m, and you'll get unresolved symbols > > due to call of I2C function from asoc. > > Yes, I agree that this would be an improvement. I'd just like to do it > for all the drivers at once rather than have some of the drivers set up > one way and some another. Fair enough. > > I'm not sure what is the proper way to fix this. If the codec driver > > supports non-I2C and can be built without it, the explicit dependency > > on I2C is of course wrong. > > Yes, and of course users will still need to ensure that the appropriate > bus driver for their platform is availiable on their system, though that > could be loaded later. Still, we could make life a little easier for > some users so it seems a worthwhile thing to do even though it doesn't > solve everything. Agreed. Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
