sw_params for a direct-ed(dmix) hw pcm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On this issue, I am doing something fundamentaly wrong, but I don't see how to
do it right.

While configuring a pcm, I should not use sw_params if it is a "direct-ed"
(direct::dmix) real hw pcm: in pcm_direct.c, snd_pcm_direct_sw_params
function is empty and it seems coherent with the fact the real hw pcm is
actually shared and was probably already configured.

How do I know a pcm is actually a "pipeline" of pcms which ends up with a
"direct-ed" real hw pcm? That would tell my code how to behave regarding
sw_params usage.

Is this related to the "topology" and "ucm" apis?

regards,

-- 
Sylvain



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux