The patch ASoC: soc-pcm: move dpcm_fe_dai_close() has been applied to the asoc tree at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark >From 30fca26f8e2277ccd14fe3277a330b4f21cadca7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 10:09:44 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: soc-pcm: move dpcm_fe_dai_close() move dpcm_fe_dai_close() next to dpcm_fe_dai_open(). This is prepare for dpcm_fe_dai_open() cleanup Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87pndqp9uv.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> --- sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c index e3a2c4f7757b..3686dda097e2 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c @@ -2978,6 +2978,26 @@ int soc_dpcm_runtime_update(struct snd_soc_card *card) return ret; } +static int dpcm_fe_dai_close(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream) +{ + struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe = fe_substream->private_data; + struct snd_soc_dpcm *dpcm; + int stream = fe_substream->stream, ret; + + mutex_lock_nested(&fe->card->mutex, SND_SOC_CARD_CLASS_RUNTIME); + ret = dpcm_fe_dai_shutdown(fe_substream); + + /* mark FE's links ready to prune */ + for_each_dpcm_be(fe, stream, dpcm) + dpcm->state = SND_SOC_DPCM_LINK_STATE_FREE; + + dpcm_be_disconnect(fe, stream); + + fe->dpcm[stream].runtime = NULL; + mutex_unlock(&fe->card->mutex); + return ret; +} + static int dpcm_fe_dai_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream) { struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe = fe_substream->private_data; @@ -3017,26 +3037,6 @@ static int dpcm_fe_dai_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream) return ret; } -static int dpcm_fe_dai_close(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream) -{ - struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe = fe_substream->private_data; - struct snd_soc_dpcm *dpcm; - int stream = fe_substream->stream, ret; - - mutex_lock_nested(&fe->card->mutex, SND_SOC_CARD_CLASS_RUNTIME); - ret = dpcm_fe_dai_shutdown(fe_substream); - - /* mark FE's links ready to prune */ - for_each_dpcm_be(fe, stream, dpcm) - dpcm->state = SND_SOC_DPCM_LINK_STATE_FREE; - - dpcm_be_disconnect(fe, stream); - - fe->dpcm[stream].runtime = NULL; - mutex_unlock(&fe->card->mutex); - return ret; -} - /* create a new pcm */ int soc_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, int num) { -- 2.20.1
