The patch ASoC: soc-pcm: add dpcm_fe_dai_cleanup() has been applied to the asoc tree at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark >From 265694b67c13f00384bd0b97549b4681cbcc85af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 10:09:49 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: soc-pcm: add dpcm_fe_dai_cleanup() dpcm_fe_dai_close() and error case of dpcm_fe_dai_open() need to do same cleanup operation. To avoid duplicate code, this patch adds dpcm_fe_dai_cleanup() and use it. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87o8tap9uq.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> --- sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c index 3686dda097e2..b405fb3a181b 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c @@ -2978,14 +2978,11 @@ int soc_dpcm_runtime_update(struct snd_soc_card *card) return ret; } -static int dpcm_fe_dai_close(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream) +static void dpcm_fe_dai_cleanup(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream) { struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe = fe_substream->private_data; struct snd_soc_dpcm *dpcm; - int stream = fe_substream->stream, ret; - - mutex_lock_nested(&fe->card->mutex, SND_SOC_CARD_CLASS_RUNTIME); - ret = dpcm_fe_dai_shutdown(fe_substream); + int stream = fe_substream->stream; /* mark FE's links ready to prune */ for_each_dpcm_be(fe, stream, dpcm) @@ -2994,6 +2991,18 @@ static int dpcm_fe_dai_close(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream) dpcm_be_disconnect(fe, stream); fe->dpcm[stream].runtime = NULL; +} + +static int dpcm_fe_dai_close(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream) +{ + struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe = fe_substream->private_data; + int ret; + + mutex_lock_nested(&fe->card->mutex, SND_SOC_CARD_CLASS_RUNTIME); + ret = dpcm_fe_dai_shutdown(fe_substream); + + dpcm_fe_dai_cleanup(fe_substream); + mutex_unlock(&fe->card->mutex); return ret; } @@ -3001,7 +3010,6 @@ static int dpcm_fe_dai_close(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream) static int dpcm_fe_dai_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream) { struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe = fe_substream->private_data; - struct snd_soc_dpcm *dpcm; struct snd_soc_dapm_widget_list *list; int ret; int stream = fe_substream->stream; @@ -3021,14 +3029,8 @@ static int dpcm_fe_dai_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream) dpcm_process_paths(fe, stream, &list, 1); ret = dpcm_fe_dai_startup(fe_substream); - if (ret < 0) { - /* clean up all links */ - for_each_dpcm_be(fe, stream, dpcm) - dpcm->state = SND_SOC_DPCM_LINK_STATE_FREE; - - dpcm_be_disconnect(fe, stream); - fe->dpcm[stream].runtime = NULL; - } + if (ret < 0) + dpcm_fe_dai_cleanup(fe_substream); dpcm_clear_pending_state(fe, stream); dpcm_path_put(&list); -- 2.20.1
