On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 8:24 PM Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 2/17/20 9:10 AM, ojab // wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 5:57 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 07:04:48PM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > >> > >>> Maybe we could have some sort of boolean flag in the component->driver > >>> definition and explicitly request a backwards-compatible behavior (e.g. for > >>> all SKL/KBL machine drivers) when that driver is known to be flaky. There's > >>> already things like 'fully_routed', maybe we can add something such as > >>> 'disable_route_check'? > >> > >> A quirk for old stuff that can't be fixed sounds like a sensible > >> solution to this. > > > > Any update on this? > > Sorry, this is what I had in mind (not even compile-tested). I don't > know if the checks need to be disabled twice. Unfortunately no sound with this patch on top of 5.6-rc2 http://alsa-project.org/db/?f=0f5049d8f7dc906bd13f354056282a48d2e626cc //wbr ojab
