On 11-01-20, 05:30, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > > On 1/10/20 10:30 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > > > > > - int sdw_prepare_stream(struct sdw_stream_runtime * stream); > > > > + int sdw_prepare_stream(struct sdw_stream_runtime * stream, > > > > bool resume); > > > > > > so what does the additional argument of resume do..? > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c > > > > index 178ae92b8cc1..6aa0b5d370c0 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c > > > > @@ -1553,8 +1553,18 @@ int sdw_prepare_stream(struct > > > > sdw_stream_runtime *stream) > > > > > > and it is not modified here, so is the doc correct or this..? > > > > the doc is correct and the code is updated in > > > > [PATCH 4/6] soundwire: stream: do not update parameters during > > DISABLED-PREPARED transition > > Sorry, wrong answer, my bad. The code block in the documentation is > incorrect. > > The Patch 4/6 implements the transition mentioned in the documentation, but > the extra parameter is a left-over from an earlier version. This case is now > handled internally. We did revert to the initial prototype after finding out > that dealing with transitions in the caller is error-prone. Glad that you agree with me on something! -- ~Vinod _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
