On 08-01-20, 11:54, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > Stream State Operations > ----------------------- > @@ -246,6 +251,9 @@ SDW_STREAM_PREPARED > > Prepare state of stream. Operations performed before entering in this state: > > + (0) Steps 1 and 2 are omitted in the case of a resume operation, > + where the bus bandwidth is known. > + > (1) Bus parameters such as bandwidth, frame shape, clock frequency, > are computed based on current stream as well as already active > stream(s) on Bus. Re-computation is required to accommodate current > @@ -270,13 +278,15 @@ Prepare state of stream. Operations performed before entering in this state: > After all above operations are successful, stream state is set to > ``SDW_STREAM_PREPARED``. > > -Bus implements below API for PREPARE state which needs to be called once per > -stream. From ASoC DPCM framework, this stream state is linked to > -.prepare() operation. > +Bus implements below API for PREPARE state which needs to be called > +once per stream. From ASoC DPCM framework, this stream state is linked > +to .prepare() operation. Since the .trigger() operations may not > +follow the .prepare(), a direct transitions from > +``SDW_STREAM_PREPARED`` to ``SDW_STREAM_DEPREPARED`` is allowed. > > .. code-block:: c > > - int sdw_prepare_stream(struct sdw_stream_runtime * stream); > + int sdw_prepare_stream(struct sdw_stream_runtime * stream, bool resume); so what does the additional argument of resume do..? > diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c > index 178ae92b8cc1..6aa0b5d370c0 100644 > --- a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c > +++ b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c > @@ -1553,8 +1553,18 @@ int sdw_prepare_stream(struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream) and it is not modified here, so is the doc correct or this..? -- ~Vinod _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
