Dne 19. 11. 19 v 21:41 Mark Brown napsal(a):
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 09:37:15PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
It's not about the protocol. It's about to move this type of
information to another place. I can remove the ALSA version sentence
from the help, because it's just a hint. I would like to create ucm2
configurations based on this rather than the misused long card names.
But why these are exclusive? The current longname workaround makes
the device appearing a bit messy, but does it conflict with the
additional component string?
Yeah, it's not clear to me why it's a config option to enable this. I
can see a config option to turn off the old display name if it's
particularly irritating to people but I can't see any reason not to
just provide the new stuff.
Yes, it is really better way to do this. I'll rewrite my patch. Thanks for the
idea.
Jaroslav
--
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxxx>
Linux Sound Maintainer; ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc.
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
