On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 09:37:15PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > It's not about the protocol. It's about to move this type of > > information to another place. I can remove the ALSA version sentence > > from the help, because it's just a hint. I would like to create ucm2 > > configurations based on this rather than the misused long card names. > But why these are exclusive? The current longname workaround makes > the device appearing a bit messy, but does it conflict with the > additional component string? Yeah, it's not clear to me why it's a config option to enable this. I can see a config option to turn off the old display name if it's particularly irritating to people but I can't see any reason not to just provide the new stuff.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
