At Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:54:24 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > > Clemens Ladisch wrote: > > >> So I should do this: > >> > >> SNDRV_PCM_RATES_5512 | SNDRV_PCM_RATE_8000_192000 | SNDRV_PCM_RATE_CONTINUOUS > > > > Yes. > > > >> That's not really elegant. > > > > How could this be made more elegant? > > Well, you could add SNDRV_PCM_RATE_ALL which be the sum of all SNDRV_PCM_RATE_xxx macros, > where xxx is some number. So for today, that would be something like this: > > #define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_ALL (SNDRV_PCM_RATE_8000_192000 | SNDRV_PCM_RATES_5512) I'd prefer 5512_19200. The word "ALL" may vary in future. Anyway, the bits SND_PCM_RATES_[0-9]* are ignored when _CONTINUOUS or _KNOT is passed. Only the values in rate_min/rate_max fields are referred as actual min/max rates. Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
