Clemens Ladisch wrote: >> So I should do this: >> >> SNDRV_PCM_RATES_5512 | SNDRV_PCM_RATE_8000_192000 | SNDRV_PCM_RATE_CONTINUOUS > > Yes. > >> That's not really elegant. > > How could this be made more elegant? Well, you could add SNDRV_PCM_RATE_ALL which be the sum of all SNDRV_PCM_RATE_xxx macros, where xxx is some number. So for today, that would be something like this: #define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_ALL (SNDRV_PCM_RATE_8000_192000 | SNDRV_PCM_RATES_5512) -- Timur Tabi Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
