"Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote on 13:00 16/03/2007 +0100 :
> At Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:54:02 +0100,
> Joachim Deguara wrote:
>> >From the HDA spec it appears that the buffers written to the BDL and
>> sent to a codec must be 128 byte aligned (section 4.5.1). The alignment
>> was not happening especially when playing 6 channels. This patch set
>> the alignment of buffers and periods to 128 bytes.
>
> Good catch.
>
> The changes look good to me, but please fold lines to fit within 80
> chars. Also, please give a sign-off for the patch to apply to the
> upstream.
>From the HDA spec it appears that the buffers written to the BDL and
sent to a codec must be 128 byte aligned (section 4.5.1). The alignment
was not happening especially when playing 6 channels. This patch set
the alignment of buffers and periods to 128 bytes.
Signed-off-by: Joachim Deguara <joachim.deguara@xxxxxxx>
diff -r f8284261b2be pci/hda/hda_intel.c
--- a/pci/hda/hda_intel.c Thu Mar 15 15:10:28 2007 +0100
+++ b/pci/hda/hda_intel.c Fri Mar 16 07:04:47 2007 +0100
@@ -1087,6 +1087,10 @@ static int azx_pcm_open(struct snd_pcm_s
runtime->hw.rates = hinfo->rates;
snd_pcm_limit_hw_rates(runtime);
snd_pcm_hw_constraint_integer(runtime, SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_PERIODS);
+ snd_pcm_hw_constraint_step(runtime, 0, SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_BUFFER_BYTES,
+ 128);
+ snd_pcm_hw_constraint_step(runtime, 0, SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_PERIOD_BYTES,
+ 128);
if ((err = hinfo->ops.open(hinfo, apcm->codec, substream)) < 0) {
azx_release_device(azx_dev);
mutex_unlock(&chip->open_mutex);
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
