On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 09:55:23AM -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 09:45 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > alsactl save & restore should work for softvol. > > > The softvol mixer element doesn't exist only at the very fresh state. > > > > I see, I just tried it and alsactl will create a user control just > > fine. That's great. > > > > I will give the softvol solution a try, and post the patches if it > > works. > > > > Isn't it inefficient to force all audio to go through a software volume > control just to have a master volume? Wouldn't it be better to make a > ganged control in the driver (until the alsa-lib abstract mixer layer is > ready)? I did consider doing it this way over the weekend. However, being able to adjust the relative volumes of the different channels still seems useful to me. If you have a single unified control, then you mess up trying to move the others. What do you think? Should I just slave them all together and remove the other volume controls? It's probably easier; it just seems somehow lacking. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
