At Thu, 5 Oct 2006 13:11:51 +0200 (CEST), Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > At Thu, 05 Oct 2006 12:10:45 +0200, > > Thierry Vignaud wrote: > > > > > > Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > > > The rollback was triggered. The repository was rolled back to > > > > the changeset number bellow. All patches on top of this changeset > > > > were lost. > > > > > > > > changeset: 4582:9233e1d82ed045609e1fb76acf00696393589031 > > > > tag: tip > > > > user: perex > > > > date: Thu Oct 05 09:30:36 2006 +0200 > > > > files: pci/ac97/ac97_patch.c > > > > description: > > > > ac97_codec (ALC655): add EAPD hack for MSI L725 laptop > > > > New PCI ID described and tested Spectr <spectr@xxxxxxxxx> . > > > > > > I think that: > > > - the reason of the rollback should be visible and the mail (aka the > > > rollback commit changelog) > > > - the rollback commit changelog) should be in the suject line rather > > > than the changelog of the commit we reverse to, since it's more > > > important > > > > The rollback has no log for itself... > > Yes, we have no additional information. Anyway, all rollbacks means "wrong > patch". In this case, I figured immediately after commit that mpu401 patch > does not make any sense and it was problem in the driver core code in > mainstream (I already proposed correct patch on LKML). Well, then in this case, something went wrong in the retrieval of the target changeset. It should have shown mpu401-stuff instead of this AC97 change. Takashi ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
