At Wed, 07 Jun 2006 13:40:21 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 16:00 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > Yeah, I guess, never really thought about that, just wrote it down the > > > way I thought to do it :) That said, I think it's more readable if > > > written that way, do you want me to change it regardless? > > > > I found a single if is more readable (and good for compiler). > > Heh ok, I'll change it, it isn't really hard to read either way. > > > > No, the only requirement is that you have to call snd_pcm_lib_malloc() > > with proper type and assigned device pointer if you use > > snd_pcm_lib_malloc() function. (If not called, you've got an error > > when compiled with debug option.) > > Ok, but how do I set the device pointer? Your code already does it. The macro pci_to_dev() retrieves struct device pointer (it's just for compatibility with older kernels). Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
