On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 16:00 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > Yeah, I guess, never really thought about that, just wrote it down the > > way I thought to do it :) That said, I think it's more readable if > > written that way, do you want me to change it regardless? > > I found a single if is more readable (and good for compiler). Heh ok, I'll change it, it isn't really hard to read either way. > No, the only requirement is that you have to call snd_pcm_lib_malloc() > with proper type and assigned device pointer if you use > snd_pcm_lib_malloc() function. (If not called, you've got an error > when compiled with debug option.) Ok, but how do I set the device pointer? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
