Re: SFGate: A shorter runway solves a long problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



A lot of SFO's traffic is heavy.  You have Cathay Pacific, Japan, Qantas, United, Nippon Cargo, Cargolux, Singapore, and many other airlines operating very large jets.

David R
 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Gerard M Foley <gfoley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> From: "Bill Hough" <psa188@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 2:00 PM
> 
> 
> This sounds too good to be true.
> <snip>
>    Suppose, on foggy or cloudy days, that the Federal Aviation 
> Administration
> closed the initial 2,000 or 3,000 or 4,000 or 5,000 feet of SFO's very
> long runway 28R and had planes begin their landings near the runway's
> midpoint, that is, with 10,000 or 9,000 or 8,000 or 7,000 feet of runway
> remaining. Then the federal rule requiring 4,300 feet of horizontal
> separation between planes shouldn't be a problem, because planes
> approaching the right runway would always be hundreds of feet above 
> those
> approaching the left runway.
> <snip>
> 
> Will wing tip vortices be a problem?  How much SFO traffic is heavy?
> 
> Gerry
> http://www.pbase.com/gfoley9999/
> http://www.wilowud.net/
> http://home.columbus.rr.com/gfoley
> http://www.fortunecity.com/victorian/pollock/263/egypt/egypt.html
> http://foley.foleypages.net/~gerry/

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]