I'm guessing you're a lawyer by profession, Alireza? Grant SYD QF ---- Alireza Alivandivafa <DEmocrat2n@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Oh come on David, isn't this getting tired? I mean, I take this as a > personal insult. B6 wont get sued (though, if this is the result of their contracted > MX, B6 might sue). Also, there are whole firms that specialize in aviation > law, so that "craphead" would know something on the subject even if someone > decided to sue. Finally, the reason they didn't continue is because they wanted > to have a controlled situation in which to land, as opposed to be forced into > an emergency somewhere for some other reason AND had to deal with the gear. > Imagine that a flap went bad and they had to land at flaps 15 instead of 30 (I > am using 737 numbers, but you get the point)? That would have meant a faster > than normal, not a slower than normal landing, and ending up off a runway > somewhere. Get off your cynical high horse and just be happy that the two > remarkable ladies on the flight deck landed that plane the way they did > > In a message dated 9/22/2005 12:37:22 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > damiross3@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: > Lawyers. If the pax found out about the gear before landing at JFK, some > crap head of a lawyer who knows nothing about aviation would have sued. > Come to think of it, JetBlue will probably be sued anyways