Re: JetBlue continues to shun SFO due to higher fees

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Why serve LAX?  I think LGB, ONT, and BUR are better airports to serve the
Southland, especially LGB because you can still board the aircraft without
going through a stupid jetway.  Does BUR still have this great feature or
have the gone to jetways also?

LAX is a crappy airport compared to LGB.  I enjoy being able to board an
aircraft without having to enter it via a jetway.

SFO is actually further away from downtown SF than OAK is.  Additionally,
OAK and, to a lesser extent, SJC are often clear when SFO is at or below
minimums.

David R
http://home.comcast.net/~damiross/books.html
www.sequoians.com
www.chanticleers.org

=>-----Original Message-----
=>From: The Airline List [mailto:AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
=>Alireza Alivandivafa
=>Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 15:44
=>To: AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
=>Subject: Re: JetBlue continues to shun SFO due to higher fees
=>
=>
=>Funny with the "carry customers where they want to go" line,
=>considering that
=>they steadfastly refuse to serve LAX
=>--
=>No virus found in this incoming message.
=>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
=>Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.6.7 - Release Date: 6/10/2005
=>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.6.7 - Release Date: 6/10/2005

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]