Re: re Jet Blue flying into Burbank - but can that airport handle airbuses?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In a message dated 3/3/2005 12:45:22 AM Central Standard Time, 
damiross3@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
If JetBlue wants nonstop BUR/JFK flights on a consistent basis, they will
need to reduce the payload of the A320.

Does any else get the feeling that JetBlue is expanding not because it has a
business reason to but because it is getting too many aircraft and it needs
routes to fly them on?


I think they need an option out of the LA area that is not LGB, because of 
the slot limitations.  They want to stay out of LAX for as long as possible, and 
that means they have to use the alternates.  If they can wring enough 
performance out of the A320 to get BUR-JFK to be consistant, good.  They will not, 
however, be doing BUR-BOS.  I think they are biding their time to break into US' 
big markets.

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]