Re: [Sky-1] Continental Outraged Over Report Of Concorde Crash Probe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



They have had prior issues w/ the concorde an FOD on the runway. It has
had past incidents of damage on take off, including one where the Capt
continued on even after he knew ther was damage.

Because of those prior incidents, the airport authority has to check for
Fod prior to landings/takeoffs.

CO is not responsible and CO employees cannot go out on the runway to
check if something fell off.

-----Original Message-----
From: The Airline List [mailto:AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Alireza Alivandivafa
Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2004 1:28 AM
To: AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Sky-1] Continental Outraged Over Report Of Concorde Crash
Probe


In a message dated 12/10/2004 6:06:07 PM Central Standard Time,
DZTOPS@xxxxxxx writes: Lots of other things would enter into it. WHos
responsible for cleaning up the runway? Were the Concordes tires sub
standard?  They knew there were problems with them and never fixed them
The reason for creating the rule about dropping debris on the runway is
because it is impossible for airports to clean a runway after every take
off. They did not know this problem existed because the only way to have
found out is exactly what happened.  The tires were fine, the same as
any other airliner.  They did switch to a radial design after the crash.
Again, they could not have known that but for the accident.  CO's
airplane was responsible for that.

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]