----- Original Message ----- From: "Tyler Munoz" <Tyler.Munoz@xxxxxxxxx> To: "Gerard M Foley" <gfoley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 4:53 PM Subject: RE: Backlash from Airbus ads still fresh Would you mind forwarding this to the list? For some reason, I'm still being moderated and the moderator never responds to my questions as to why. Thanks a bunch! -----Original Message----- From: Tyler Munoz Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 4:32 PM To: 'The Airline List'; 'Gerard M Foley' Subject: RE: Backlash from Airbus ads still fresh What about the following: + TAP (A340 from JFK I think) + SATA (A310 from BOS) + CSA (A310 from EWR) + FedEx (A300s from east coast cities to Europe maybe) -----Original Message----- From: The Airline List [mailto:AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gerard M Foley Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 4:18 PM To: AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Backlash from Airbus ads still fresh From: "Clay Wardlow" <clay.wardlow@xxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 11:08 AM <snip> > Meanwhile, Airbus just started a new ad campaign <snip> > One of the planes in the ad is an A330. Two engines, it would seem, > really are as good as four, regardless of which side of the Atlantic you > are building jetliners on. I have a strong impression that aside from Lufthansa's A340 services, there are relatively few Airbus's used over the North Atlantic. I can't think of any A300 or A310 operations, and the only two engine Airbuses I recall are Canadian A330's. If I'm right, any ideas why? Please don't say they're unsafe. Gerry http://www.pbase.com/gfoley9999/ http://foley.ultinet.net/~gerry/aerial/aerial.html http://home.columbus.rr.com/gfoley http://www.fortunecity.com/victorian/pollock/263/egypt/egypt.html